CARBON SEQUESTRATION- IS IT A NEW LEASE OF LIFE FOR COAL FIRED ELECTRICAL POWER PLANTS?
New technology has been discovered to “catch” the carbon dioxide (CO2) before it enters the environment, thus helping reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions. A power plant in Tampa, Florida U.S.A, has been established using this concept.
During the power producing process the CO2 gas is driven under heat and pressure. The CO2 is piped and then stored underground by drilling a bore into porous rock, such as sandstone. The hole is then capped by clay. This process is known as “Terrestrial Carbon sequestration”.
Carbon Sequestration
The U.S Department of Energy defines “Carbon sequestration” as: “a family of methods for capturing and permanently isolating gases that otherwise could contribute to global climate change”. Affordable and environmentally safe sequestration approaches could offer a way to stabilise atmospheric levels of CO2 without requiring the countries to make large-scale and potentially costly changes to their energy infrastructures.
Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration
Terrestrial carbon sequestration is defined as: “either the net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere or the prevention of CO2 net emissions from the terrestrial ecosystems into the atmosphere”. [Source: U.S Department of Energy]
Problems with Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration
The problem with this concept is finding the right location to be able to drill into. A project is also planned in West Virginia as it has the suitable porous rock to drill into. Australia has also been looking into carbon sequestration research as a way of tackling Greenhouse Gas emission problems, with projects underway in South Australia along the “Great Australian Bight”. New coal-fired plants with this CO2 “catching” process are far more expensive than the traditional coal fired power stations, so there has been no rush to establish new plants at this stage unless politicians induce firms, to take on this technology. So far there is no indication that this will occur, so at this stage traditional polluting coal fired power stations are here to stay.
Alternative forms of Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration
Enhancing the natural processes that remove CO2 from the atmosphere is thought to be one of the most cost-effective means of reducing atmospheric levels of CO2, and forestation and deforestation abatement efforts are already under way. R&D in this program area seeks to increase this rate while properly considering all the ecological, social, and economic implications. There are two fundamental approaches to sequestering carbon in terrestrial ecosystems:
1. Protection of ecosystems that store carbon so that carbon stores can be maintained or increased; and; 2. Manipulation of ecosystems to increase carbon sequestration beyond current conditions.
This program area is focused on integrating measures for improving the full life-cycle carbon uptake of terrestrial ecosystems, including farmland and forests, with fossil fuel production and use. The following ecosystems offer significant opportunity for carbon sequestration:
Forest lands. The focus includes below-ground carbon and long-term management and utilisation of standing stocks, under-story, ground cover, and litter.
Agricultural lands. The focus includes crop lands, grasslands, and range lands, with emphasis on increasing long-lived soil carbon.
Biomass croplands. As a complement to ongoing efforts related to biofuels ,the focus is on long-term increases in soil carbon and value-added organic products.
Deserts and degraded lands. Restoration of degraded lands offers significant benefits and carbon sequestration potential in both below-and above-ground systems.
Boreal wetlands and peat-lands. The focus includes management of soil carbon pools and perhaps limited conversion to forest or grassland vegetation where ecologically acceptable.
Related posts:


Virginia, I hope and pray that youve been reading the other posts regarding your comments This healthcare bill is another step closer to Socialism, and the Chicago Politics by this Administration .. Do you wonder why Rohm Immanuel is taking the Blue Dog Democrats to the woodshed for an arm-breaking meeting? Many of the Democrats are not onboard this plan, and they are looking out for themselves in the 2010 elections .. Americans are rising up against this bill and Congress!! Any Politician who votes FOR this bill, will pay a price at the polls next year! Hopefully you watch TV and see how upset Americans are .. and they are NOT Manufactued, Astroturf citizens Were from all over the Country .. How can so many Patriotic Americans be so upset over this bill, you ask ? Because its akin to patient dumping . We will be told how to manage our healthcare by the Govt., instead of our Doctors and what treatments the Govt. will pay for .. So, if you need a hip replacement when youre 85, youre too old, and pain pills will be your only choice . You will be old one day, and I hope you realize now what it could mean to YOU, as you age Your vote for this bill will affect everyone in YOUR family as well from your ageing parents to a child born with a birth defect .. The Govt will decide who can live and who wont its just that simple Whatever decision you make, make it an informed, educated one As I said in an earlier post, I dont have health insurance for myself .. but this plan would NOT be a public option for me
I am really enjoying the theme/design of your blog. Do you ever run into any web browser compatibility issues? A handful of my blog readers have complained about my website not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any solutions to help fix this problem?